Mar 29, 2009
Mar 28, 2009
Ethics of Reparations
First, the injury is distorted and hidden under the category of "slave trade". The category trade tends to sanitize the high level of violence and mass murder that was inflicted on African peoples and societies. If the categorization of the Holocaust of Enslavement can be reduced to the category of "trade" two things happen. First, it becomes more of a commercial issue and problem than a moral one. And secondly, since trade is the primary focus, the mass murder or genocide can be and often is conveniently understood and accepted a simply collateral damage of a commercial venture gone bad.
A second attempt of the established order to deny the horrendous nature of the injury and its essential responsibility for it is to claim collaboration of the victims in their own victimization. Here it is morally and factually important to make a distinction between collaborators among the people and the people themselves. Every people faced with conquest, oppression and destruction has had collaborators among them, but it is factually inaccurate and morally wrong and repulsive to indict a whole people for a holocaust which was imposed on them and was aided by collaborators. Every holocaust had collaborators: the Native Americans, Jews, Australoids, Armenians and Africans. No one morally sensitive claims Jews are responsible for their holocaust based on the evidence of Jewish collaborators. How then are Africans indicted for the collaborators among them?
Although there are other ways, the established order seeks to undermine the factual and moral basis of the African claim for reparations, these two are indispensable to its efforts. And thus, they must be raised up and rejected constantly, for they speak to the indispensable need to define the injury to African people and to maintain control of it.
As Us has maintained since the Sixties concerning European cultural hegemony, one of the greatest powers in the world is to be able to define reality and make others accept it even when it's to their disadvantage. And it is this power to define the injury of holocaust as trade and self-victimization and make Africans accept it, that has dominated the discourse on enslavement in America. Our task it to reframe the discourse and initiate a new national dialog on this.
We have argued that the injury must be defined as holocaust. By holocaust we mean a morally monstrous act of genocide that is not only against the people themselves, but also a crime against humanity. The Holocaust of enslavement expresses itself in three basic ways: the morally monstrous destruction of human life, human culture and human possibility.
In terms of the destruction of human life, estimates run as high as ten to a hundred million persons killed individually and collectively in various brutal and vicious ways. The destruction of culture includes the destruction of centers, products and producers of culture: cities, towns, villages, libraries, great literatures (written and oral), and works of art and other cultural creations as well as the creative and skilled persons who produced them.
And finally, the morally monstrous destruction of human possibility involved redefining African humanity to the world, poisoning past, present and future relations with others who only know us through this stereotyping and thus damaging the truly human relations among peoples. It also involves lifting Africans out of their own history making them a footnote and forgotten casualty in European history and thus limiting and denying their ability to speak their own special cultural truth to the world and make their own unique contribution to the forward flow of human history.
It is here that the issue of stolen labor and ill-gotten gains which is seen as important to the legal case can be raised. For in removing us from our own history, enslaving us and brutally exploiting our labor, it limited and prevented us from building our own future and living the lives of dignity and decency which is our human right.
Mar 24, 2009
History of Evil
OUR HOLOCAUST
Europeans killed 95% of our population from 1492 until the 19th century
23 million in Mexico and "Central America"
10 million in Canada and "the USA"
An additional 30 to 70 million were killed
in what is called South America and the Caribbean.
ALL TOGETHER 70 TO 100 MILLION OF OUR PEOPLE
WERE KILLED IN CEMANAHUAC ("WESTERN HEMISPHERE.
We have no photos to show you of our holocaust. There are no movies
or long poems to move you to understand
the monstrosity of this crime of the Europeans.
The illustrations below give you some idea of the savage nature
of the European crimes against our people.
These illustrations on the left column below are
from the 16th century.
They were done by Europeans.
The illustrations on the right column below
are from Nelyollotl Toltecatl of the Mexica Movement.
These drawings were done from descriptions of the crimes
that were committed against our people.
What you need to understand
at this moment
is that the majority of our people
were killed by biological weapons of mass destruction,
mostly in the form of smallpox.
We have been told that this series of mass killings
with smallpox were only an accident.
That is a shameless lie.
How could it be "an accident"
in the Caribbean,
in Mexico and "Central America",
in South America,
in California,
in Florida,
in "New England",
and in the rest of the Western Hemisphere.
Europeans then went on to use this same weapon
in Hawaii and other parts of the world
where they found non-European people
that were rich in land and resources
but vulnerable to smallpox.
One day we will have the proper tears and heart
to understand the full meaning of this Genocide
that has left us in the enslaved and robbed condition
in which we exist today.
Mar 5, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)